When I'm looking for information on a variety of topics relating to the City of Calgary (the city itself as well as the government entity) www.calgary.ca is a most valuable tool. Within it's pages are a number of reports, statistics, and documents containing information on a wide variety of topics from services,departments, budgets, contact information, etc.
Among its pages is one dedicated to the 2026 Olympic bid which is sorely lacking in useful information. It seems to be more of a cheer-leading document, extolling the benefits of hosting the games while glossing over the little things, such as the cost.
It does however have links to reports prepared by outside experts assessing the potential impact of hosting an Olympic games. I do not find the findings of their economic impact studies to be a ringing endorsement for a bid.
A Review of Two Economic Impact Studies of
Calgary Hosting the 2026 Winter Games
Trevor Tombe, University of Calgary, Department of Economics and the School of Public Policy
Regarding the use of public funds: Section 3.1
Why does it matter how much public funds are used? Simple: tax revenue costs the economy
more than one dollar for each dollar raised, as taxes distort economic activity. Researchers
measure the magnitude of this effect in what is called the “marginal cost of public funds” -- if the
marginal cost is 1.5, then raising $1 in government revenue costs the economy $1.50. A large
empirical literature in public finance consistently finds these costs can be very large. In the
11
latest research available for Canadian provinces, for example, Prof. Bev Dahlby of the
University of Calgary -- a leading researcher in this area -- finds a typical dollar raised through
corporate taxes costs the economy $3.93 dollars. Personal income and sales taxes have lower
costs, at $2.86 and $1.59 dollars, respectively. Provinces differ, and such costs are lower in
12
Alberta, but the general principle is sound: there is a cost of raising public funds.
Final Paragraph: Section 5 Conclusions and Recommendations
In the end, there will be economic costs of hosting the games. If the benefits in terms of civic
pride, community engagement, promotion of sports, and so on, is worth the cost, then hosting
the games makes sense. But, to claim that GDP and employment will increase -- at all, but
especially by the magnitudes suggested in the 3rd-party reports -- is to go far beyond what the
evidence suggests.
For me the economic arguments carry more weight than the emotional ones do. Sometimes it just has to be that way. There is simply too much at stake. A 2026 bid is NOT the right decision for Calgary.
For more information Visit the 2026 Olympic Bid webpage at:
http://www.calgary.ca/CSPS/Recreation/Pages/Calgary-2026-Olympic-bid/Olympics-Bid-2026.aspx
D.B.C.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Big Red Twitter Block Leaves Questions Unanswered
I have been Tweeting Diane Colley-Urquhart of late to try to get her to explain comments she made on April 6th about fellow Councillor Jerom...
-
So the main reason that I started this blog was because of what has happened in the neighbourhood since the Westbrook C-Train station opened...
-
The Calgary Municipal Land Corp. (CMLC) announced Thursday that Los Angeles artist Christian Moeller has been commissioned to create the pub...
-
An emotional Les Kaminski held a press conference earlier this morning, calling for the release of the names of the individuals who were sho...
No comments:
Post a Comment